Before the midterm elections, politicians have bombarded voters
with ads and speeches. One neuroscientist says that their hand
gestures may make all the difference in how we perceive their
message. This ScienCentral News video has more.
Talking Hands
In the 2000 presidential campaign, many observers labeled Al Gore
as stiff. Lauren Solomon, an image consultant, has worked
with politicians and executives for 13 years on how to handle
themselves in public speaking situations. She thinks the problem
wasn't just his language, it was his body language.
"If you don't believe that there is a link between your words and
your gestures, then you're only going to get half of the languaged
message across to your audience," she says.
Colgate
University neuroscientist Spencer Kelly found that hand gestures actually
influence how our brain processes speech. "Some people think that
gestures are actually separate from language," he says. "I believe
they are part of language and that means if you're going to
understand language, you can't just focus on speech, you have to
focus on speech and gesture."
Kelly used an electroencephalograph (EEG) machine to measure the
electrical brain activity of volunteers while they were shown
gestures that contradict what's spoken. "I present gestures that
convey one piece of information like gesturing to the shortness of
an object and then I present a word like 'tall,'" Kelly says. He
found that while witnessing contradictory gestures, volunteers
produced the same brain wave pattern as people listening to
confusing language -- called the N400 effect.
Discovered in 1980 by University of California, La Jolla,
researchers Marta Kutas and Steven Hillyard, the N400 effect is a signature negative brain wave
with a peak at approximately 400 milliseconds after the final word
is spoken. "If you say, 'the man likes cream and sugar in his
socks,' the brain finds that to be unusual," says Kelly. "It doesn't
make sense given the sentence ... So the N400 reflects a violation
of your expectation of what a word should be."
As featured in Scientific American Mind, that suggests
that the brain sees gestures as an integral part of communication.
Without them, our brains only get part of the story. According to
Kelly's paper, may be integrated into the brain in early
or late stages of language processing.
Kelly, a self-proclaimed "prolific gesturer, for better or
worse," theorizes that gesturing can be good for both people trying
to communicate information and for audiences trying to understand
that message. "Hands aren't just good for changing tires, or writing
letters, hands are also good for thinking. And when you're speaking,
these things are ripe for the taking," he says.
 |
Volunteers heard the word "tall" while
watching a video of a hand moving towards a short glass. Kelly
observed the N400 effect during these gesture
mismatches. image: Colgate
University |
But he also warns
politicians about contradictory hand gestures. "I once saw a
politician when describing some policy issues in the Middle East,
say, 'We must bring peace to the Middle East.' And simultaneously,
multiple times, made pounding gestures with his fist," he says. He
suggests that this politician may have been saying one thing, but
thinking another.
So his advice to politicians: "It's probably safe to keep to the
scripted gestures." But when they go off the script, like during a
debate, he says that politicians should make sure that their
gestures speak along with their words.
He says teachers can also use this advice when introducing new
words to their kids, whether it's a foreign language teacher saying
a new word or other teachers introducing new ideas. "If students'
brains are wired up to connect gesture and speech, you better use
gestures with your speech to best increase learning for those
children."
Kelly's future research will look at how we change our
communication style when we can't gesture, like when we talk on the
phone.
Kelly's research was featured in the October/November 2006 issue
of Scientific
American Mind and published in Brain and Language, April 2004. This study
was funded by Colgate University.